Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Attosecond spectroscopy of size-resolved water clusters

Abstract

Electron dynamics in water are of fundamental importance for a broad range of phenomena1,2,3, but their real-time study faces numerous conceptual and methodological challenges4,5,6. Here we introduce attosecond size-resolved cluster spectroscopy and build up a molecular-level understanding of the attosecond electron dynamics in water. We measure the effect that the addition of single water molecules has on the photoionization time delays7,8,9of water clusters. We find a continuous increase of the delay for clusters containing up to four to five molecules and little change towards larger clusters. We show that these delays are proportional to the spatial extension of the created electron hole, which first increases with cluster size and then partially localizes through the onset of structural disorder that is characteristic of large clusters and bulk liquid water. These results indicate a previously unknown sensitivity of photoionization delays to electron-hole delocalization and indicate a direct link between electronic structure and attosecond photoionization dynamics. Our results offer new perspectives for studying electron-hole delocalization and its attosecond dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content,access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Attosecond coincidence spectroscopy of size-resolved water clusters.
Fig. 2: APS of size-resolved water clusters.
Fig. 3: Size-resolved photoionization time delays of water clusters.
Fig. 4: Effect of orbital delocalization on photoionization delays of water clusters.
Fig. 5: Effect of orbital delocalization on photoionization delays of poly-acetylenes.

Data availability

Source dataare provided with this paper.

Code availability

All non-standard code used to analyse the data is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Sanche, L. Beyond radical thinking.Nature461, 358–359 (2009).

    ArticleADSCASGoogle Scholar

  2. Boudaiffa, B., Cloutier, P., Hunting, D., Huels, M. A. & Sanche, L. Resonant formation of DNA strand breaks by low-energy (3 to 20 eV) electrons.Science287, 1658–1660 (2000).

    ArticleADSCASGoogle Scholar

  3. Garrett, B. C. et al. Role of water in electron-initiated processes and radical chemistry: issues and scientific advances.Chem. Rev.105, 355–390 (2005).

    ArticleCASGoogle Scholar

  4. Svoboda, V. et al. Real-time observation of water radiolysis and hydrated electron formation induced by extreme-ultraviolet pulses.Sci. Adv.6, eaaz0385 (2020).

    ArticleADSCASGoogle Scholar

  5. Loh, Z.-H. et al. Observation of the fastest chemical processes in the radiolysis of water.Science367, 179–182 (2020).

    ArticleADSCASGoogle Scholar

  6. Jordan, I. et al. Attosecond spectroscopy of liquid water.Science369, 974–979 (2020).

    ArticleADSCASGoogle Scholar

  7. Schultze, M. et al. Delay in photoemission.Science328, 1658–1662 (2010).

    ArticleADSCASGoogle Scholar

  8. Klünder, K. et al. Probing single-photon ionization on the attosecond time scale.理论物理。Rev. Lett.106, 143002 (2011).

    ArticleADSGoogle Scholar

  9. Huppert, M., Jordan, I., Baykusheva, D., von Conta, A. & Wörner, H. J. Attosecond delays in molecular photoionization.理论物理。Rev. Lett.117, 093001 (2016).

  10. Alizadeh, E., Orlando, T. M. & Sanche, L. Biomolecular damage induced by ionizing radiation: the direct and indirect effects of low-energy electrons on DNA.Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.66, 379–398 (2015).

    ArticleADSCASGoogle Scholar

  11. Marsalek, O. et al. Chasing charge localization and chemical reactivity following photoionization in liquid water.J. Chem. Phys.135, 224510 (2011).

    ArticleADSGoogle Scholar

  12. 安德森,p . w .缺乏在某些ra扩散ndom lattices.理论物理。Rev.109, 1492–1505 (1958).

    ArticleADSCASGoogle Scholar

  13. Hunt, P., Sprik, M. & Vuilleumier, R. Thermal versus electronic broadening in the density of states of liquid water.Chem. Phys. Lett.376, 68–74 (2003).

    ArticleADSCASGoogle Scholar

  14. Prendergast, D., Grossman, J. C. & Galli, G. The electronic structure of liquid water within density-functional theory.J. Chem. Phys.123, 014501 (2005).

    ArticleADSGoogle Scholar

  15. Pieniazek, P. A., Sundstrom, E. J., Bradforth, S. E. & Krylov, A. I. Degree of initial hole localization/delocalization in ionized water clusters.J. Phys. Chem. A.113, 4423–4429 (2009).

    ArticleCASGoogle Scholar

  16. Winter, B. et al. Full valence band photoemission from liquid water using EUV synchrotron radiation.J. Phys. Chem. A.108, 2625–2632 (2004).

    ArticleCASGoogle Scholar

  17. Pohl, M. N. et al. Do water’s electrons care about electrolytes?Chem. Sci.10, 848–865 (2019).

    ArticleCASGoogle Scholar

  18. Dörner, R. et al. Cold target recoil ion momentum spectroscopy: a ‘momentum microscope’ to view atomic collision dynamics.理论物理。Rep.330, 95–192 (2000).

    ArticleADSGoogle Scholar

  19. Ullrich, J. et al. Recoil-ion and electron momentum spectroscopy: reaction microscopes.Rep. Prog. Phys.66, 1463–1545 (2003).

    ArticleADSCASGoogle Scholar

  20. Shiromaru, H., Shinohara, H., Washida, N., Yoo, H. & Kimura, K. Synchrotron radiation measurements of appearance potentials for (H2O)2+, (H2O)3+, (H2O)2H+and (H2O)3H+in supersonic jets.Chem. Phys. Lett.141, 7–11 (1987).

    ArticleADSCASGoogle Scholar

  21. Dong, F., Heinbuch, S., Rocca, J. J. & Bernstein, E. R. Dynamics and fragmentation of van der Waals clusters: (H2O)n, (CH3OH)n, and (NH3)nupon ionization by a 26.5 eV soft X-ray laser.J. Chem. Phys.124, 224319 (2006).

    ArticleADSCASGoogle Scholar

  22. Baykusheva, D. & Wörner, H. J. Theory of attosecond delays in molecular photoionization.J. Chem. Phys.146, 124306 (2017).

    ArticleADSGoogle Scholar

  23. Dahlström, J. M., L’Huillier, A. & Maquet, A. Introduction to attosecond delays in photoionization.J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Opt. Phys.45, 183001 (2012).

    ArticleGoogle Scholar

  24. Barth, S. et al. Valence ionization of water clusters: from isolated molecules to bulk.J. Phys. Chem. A113, 13519–13527 (2009).

    ArticleCASGoogle Scholar

  25. Jordan, I. & Wörner, H. J. Extracting attosecond delays from spectrally overlapping interferograms.J. Opt.20, 024013 (2018).

    ArticleADSGoogle Scholar

  26. Shi, Z., Ford, J. V., Wei, S. & Castleman, A. W. Water clusters: contributions of binding energy and entropy to stability.J. Chem. Phys.99, 8009–8015 (1993).

    ArticleADSCASGoogle Scholar

  27. Liu, K., Cruzan, J. D. & Saykally, R. J. Water clusters.Science271, 929–933 (1996).

    ArticleADSCASGoogle Scholar

  28. Temelso, B., Archer, K. A. & Shields, G. C. Benchmark structures and binding energies of small water clusters with anharmonicity corrections.J. Phys. Chem. A.115, 12034–12046 (2011).

    ArticleCASGoogle Scholar

  29. Malloum, A., Fifen, J. J., Dhaouadi, Z., Nana Engo, S. G. & Conradie, J. Structures, relative stability and binding energies of neutral water clusters, H2On,n = 2-30.New J. Chem.43, 13020–13037 (2019).

    ArticleCASGoogle Scholar

  30. Gianturco, F. A., Lucchese, R. R. & Sanna, N. Calculation of low-energy elastic cross sections for electron-CF4scattering.J. Chem. Phys.100, 6464–6471 (1994).

    ArticleADSCASGoogle Scholar

  31. Natalense, A. P. P. & Lucchese, R. R. Cross section and asymmetry parameter calculation for sulfur 1sphotoionization of SF6.J. Chem. Phys.111, 5344–5348 (1999).

    ArticleADSCASGoogle Scholar

  32. Rescigno, T. N., Lengsfield III, B. H. & McCurdy, C. W. inModern Electronic Structure TheoryVol. 1 (ed. Yarkony, D. R.) 501–588 (World Scientific, 1995).

  33. Rescigno, T. N., McCurdy, C. W., Orel, A. E. & Lengsfield III, B. H. inComputational Methods for Electron-Molecule Collisions(eds Huo, W. & Gianturco, F.) 1–44 (Springer, 1995).

  34. Orel, A. E. & Rescigno, T. N. Variational expressions for first-order properties involving continuum wave functions.理论物理。启一个41, 1695–1697 (1990).

    ArticleADSCASGoogle Scholar

  35. Silvestri, F. & Marrocchi, A. Acetylene-based materials in organic photovoltaics.Int. J. Mol. Sci.11, 1471–1508 (2010).

    ArticleCASGoogle Scholar

  36. Jahnke, T. et al. Ultrafast energy transfer between water molecules.Nat. Phys.6, 139–142 (2010).

    ArticleCASGoogle Scholar

  37. Mucke, M. et al. A hitherto unrecognized source of low-energy electrons in water.Nat. Phys.6, 143–146 (2010).

    ArticleCASGoogle Scholar

  38. Zhang, P., Perry, C., Luu, T. T., Matselyukh, D. & Wörner, H. J. Intermolecular Coulombic decay in liquid water.理论物理。Rev. Lett.128, 133001 (2022).

    ArticleADSCASGoogle Scholar

  39. Unger, I. et al. Observation of electron-transfer-mediated decay in aqueous solution.Nat. Chem.9, 708–714 (2017).

    ArticleCASGoogle Scholar

  40. Hermann, G. et al. Orbkit: a modular python toolbox for cross-platform postprocessing of quantum chemical wavefunction data.J. Comput. Chem.37, 1511–1520 (2016).

    ArticleCASGoogle Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank A. Schneider and M. Seiler for their technical support. We gratefully acknowledge funding from an European Research Council Consolidator grant (project no. 772797-ATTOLIQ), project no. 200021_172946 as well as the NCCR-MUST, funding instruments of the Swiss National Science Foundation. D.J. thanks the European Union’s Horizon 2020 programme (FP-RESOMUS – MSCA 801459) program for a fellowship and A. Schild for introduction to ORBKIT. X.G. thanks the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 12122404 and 11974114) for financial support. Most of the theoretical results have been obtained on the ETH Zürich Euler cluster and the NCCR-Cluster supercomputer. The basis-set complex Kohn variational calculations, obtained at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), were realized with the support of the US Department of Energy (DOE) under contract no. DE-AC02-05CH11231. Calculations performed there made use of the resources of the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Centre, a DOE Office of Science User Facility, and the Lawrencium computational cluster resource provided by the IT Division at the LBNL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

X.G. and S.H. carried out the experiments and analysed the experimental data. X.G. constructed the experimental apparatus with contributions from S.H., K.Z. and C.P. D.J. performed most of the theoretical calculations. R.L. realized the basis-set complex Kohn variational calculations. X.G., S.H. and H.J.W wrote the initial manuscript. All authors discussed and reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence toHans Jakob Wörner.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Naturethanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.Peer reviewer reportsare available.

Additional information

Publisher’s note施普林格自然仍neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Effect of the channel coupling on photoionization delays of the 1b1band.

a, Calculated time delays for photoionization out of the 1b1band of water clusters relative to H2O for a kinetic energy of eKE = 6.0 eV (SB12). The results of the single-channel calculations using ePolyScat30,31(filled circles) are compared with multi-channel calculations using the basis-set complex Kohn method32,33,34(filled triangles) are compared. The experimental results are identical to those shown in Fig.3.b, Same asa, but calculated/measured for SB14.

Source data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Effect of orbital delocalization on photoionization delays of the 3a1band.

Correlation between the photoionization delays and the first moment of the electron-hole density of the 3a1-orbital-band of water monomer and tetramer (s4) for a kinetic energy of eKE = 6 eV.

Source data

扩展数据图3分子的几何效应on orbital delocalization and photoionization delays of (H2O)4s4.

The structures are obtained from AIMD time propagation at different times (see legend). AIMD are run using density-functional theory, the Turbomole software package, the B3-LYP density functional, the def2-TZVP basis and a temperature ofT = 100 K.

Source data

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary text, figures and references.

Peer Review File

Source data

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gong, X., Heck, S., Jelovina, D.et al.Attosecond spectroscopy of size-resolved water clusters.Nature609, 507–511 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05039-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05039-8

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by ourTermsandCommunity Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for theNature Briefingnewsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing
Baidu
map